Cinderella Inspired Poem
Dear Cinderella
by Dorlana Vann
Dear Mom,
Cinders on your face and hands, so you said.
Instead of supper you were sent to bed.
No one to play with—No huge castle walls.
Dined on the cold floor like one of the dogs.
Everyday I must hear your sad stories.
Really mother, they are getting boring.
Ellen, you start, you are so very blessed.
Living the sweet life of a spoiled princess.
Let me live it and make my own mistakes.
And you’ll see wealth is not an evil trait.
Your Loving Daughter,
Ellen
Writing in Silence
As everyone is writing this month either for NaNoWriMo, or like me, working on a work-in-progress, I’m curious as to if you must write in silence, listen to music, or need a noisy coffee shop in order to write.
I’m a silent writer: no people, no television, no music. There are a couple of reasons for this. One, I type a few sentences behind my thoughts. So if I’m interrupted, it is a big possibility I’ll lose my train of thought. Two, I can’t concentrate with noise. I get distracted too easily. I have to be able to go into my writer-trance.
Of course there isn’t complete silence. There are a few sounds that I guess I’m used to because I have to really stop and listen to hear them: birds, cars, the tick-tock of the clock on the wall, and my fat cat snoring next to my desk. 
Happy writing!
Love and Laughter,
Dorlana
Writer Humor from The Carol Burnett Show
Sometimes when I’m writing/editing and changing a lot of things around, I imagine my characters getting disgusted at me and saying, “Make up your mind, woman!” It reminds my of the writer skits from “The Carol Burnett Show” like the one below. Funny Stuff.
September Book and a Movie: Atonement
Book: Atonement (2001) by Ian McEwan
Movie: Atonement (2007) directed by Joe Wright Screenplay by: Christopher Hampton
The set up:
Each month four of us (women ages 20-45) pick a book that has been made into a movie. We read the book and then get together for thematic food and to watch the movie.
On the menu:
We don’t know what the others are bringing. All we know is our category: appetizer, entrée (2 of us get this), or dessert. We can take food items directly from the book or go more inspirational. Below is what we ended up with this month.
Appetizer: Roasted Cauliflower and Heirloom tomato salad
Entrée: Quiche Florentine and French Bread
Entrée: Only one this time, we had one person who couldn’t make it this week.
Dessert: Chocolate bread pudding
My Book Review:
I liked it. Here are the words I jotted down to the describe the book: Intense, boring, sad, excellent writing. It had its ups and downs. I skimmed a lot, especially the war chapters. The author was very descriptive and really wanted to give his readers insight into each character, which sometimes made me sleepy but still a very thought provoking book: how young is too young to be responsible for your actions.
My Movie Review:
I didn’t like it very much. It was boring, especially the war scenes (which I really didn’t see what they had to do with the main plot of the story – in the movie or the book for that matter) The beginning moved really quickly through the scenes, and if I wouldn’t have read the book, I don’t think I would have really understood what was going on – and I probably wouldn’t have watched the entire thing.
Interesting Discoveries:
We were really surprised to learn that the film was nominated and won a lot of awards. Including an Oscar for Best Achievement in Music Written for Motion Pictures, Original Score
Dario Marianelli (which I guess the music was fine) Here is a link on IMDB that list all 27 nominations: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0783233/awards?ref_=tt_awd
The Girly Discussions:
There was some discussion about the casting of Lola and Emily (the mother). They didn’t fit what we thought they would look like.
The costumes were awesome.
Most of us (I’m not going to name any names – lol) didn’t finish the book, so the premovie discussion was mostly about how boring the book was. But we all read to at least the middle of the book and so we were disappointed with how rushed the beginning of the movie seemed. Also, the sequence of events (going back to redo a scene from another character’s POV) seemed disjointed.
My Rating:
Book: 4 out of 5 stars
Movie: 2 out of 5 stars
The Bottom Line:
The book had too many details … the movie didn’t have enough details in the first half. Read the book, skip the movie. However, if you do want to watch the movie, be sure and read the book first. But then again, maybe the people who gave the movie such high marks didn’t read the book and therefore appreciated it more… IDK
Next month’s Book and Movie:
Love and Laughter,
Dorlana
Rough Draft: the Good, the Fair, and the Ugly
After reading through and making notes to the rough draft of my novel, I scored each chapter on how well I believed it flowed and how much work was still needed. Right now, I’m on chapter 6 (Fair) and I really like how this tiny bit of information has helped me as I approach each chapter. Here are the results:
9 out 30 “Good”
1 out of 30 “Good but slow in beginning”
3 out of 30 “Good but short”
6 out of 30 “Fair”
6 out of 30 “Needs Work”
3 of them I didn’t mark for some unknown reason.
2 chapters really stood out: 23 I loved & 27 I hated.
By the end of the 2nd draft I hope to have at least all the “Needs Work” at “Fair”. And all the “Fair” to “Good” And all the “Good but short” chapters only “Good.” It would be so cool if all the “Good” were changed to “Awesome” – lol – but I’ll take have to take it one draft at a time.
Here is the breakdown:
- Good
- Needs work
- Needs work
- Good
- Fair
- Fair
- Needs work
- I didn’t mark
- Good but short
- Good
- Good but short
- Good
- Good
- Good but slow in the beginning
- Fair
- Needs work
- Good
- Good
- Good but short
- I didn’t mark
- Needs work
- Fair
- Intense – Awesome!
- Fair
- Good
- Fair
- Lousy chapter – Needs lots of work
- Good
- Needs work
- Didn’t mark
Regarding the title of this post – yeah, I’m a Clint Eastwood western fan
Love and Laughter,
Dorlana 🙂
Psycho: Movie and a Book for August
Movie: Psycho (1960) Alfred Hitchcock
Book: Psycho (1959) by Robert Bloch.
The set up:
Each month four of us (women ages 20-45) pick a book that has been made into a movie. We read the book and then get together for thematic food and to watch the movie.
On the menu:
We don’t know what the others are bringing. All we know is our category: appetizer, entrée (2 of us get this), or dessert. We can take food items directly from the book or go more inspirational. Below is what we ended up with this month.
Appetizer: Pickles, Cheese, Summer sausage
Entrée: Sandwiches – an assortment of meats and cheeses, sour dough and rye bread.
Entrée: Cheese wrapped baked potatoes that had been cut and sliced.
Dessert: Coffee cake (decorated with shower curtain rings and a huge knife) and coffee ice cream
My Book Review:
Before I started reading the book, I already knew the twist (I watched the movie years ago) so there were no big surprises. I really enjoyed Bloch’s writing style. It was easy-going, and he really knows how to set a mood. By far, my favorite scene was the one at the end where Norman Bates (Anthony Perkins) and Sam Loomis (John Gavin) are in the office – this, to me, was worth reading the entire book. The mood shifted and we got to see the darker side of Norman. Also it went from Sam feeling like he had the upper hand – to gradually realizing he did not. What an awesome suspenseful shift in reality.
My Movie Review:
I found the movie visually outstanding. Hitchcock used textures, lighting, and shading to really enhance the black and white movie.
It was a little slow in the beginning, and we were like, “Get on with it.” But once it did get going, and this might sound strange, the movie ended up being so much fun. We were cracking up laughing at so many of the “scary scenes” and were highly entertained.
Interesting Discoveries:
While watching the movie, Hitchcock was spotted and so were a lot of birds.
After watching the movie, we discovered something very interesting: Hitchcock actually intended the movie to be a comedy. He really was way before his time; it took a modern audience to really appreciate his sense of humor. Here’s the interview about it:
Hitchcock: Psycho meant to be a comedy
The Girly Discussions:
Half of us thought the sister, Lila Crane, played by Vera Miles looked younger than Janet Leigh and the other half thought she looked older.
We all agreed that Norman started out looking kind of cute in the beginning but then by the time we hit the end of the movie he was downright creepy. But Sam was way better looking.
My rating:
At first I thought the book was better than the movie. I thought Hitchcock left out the most suspenseful scene in the book (my favorite from above) and wondered why he changed Norman’s appearance. And there were other things, too. But it makes sense now: the book was horror, the movie was a comedy.
Book: 4 out of 5 stars
Movie: 5 out of 5 stars
The bottom line:
I’m really glad I read the book and watched the movie. If you haven’t watched Psycho in a while, grab a few friends and watch the movie in the frame of mind that you are about to watch a comedy.
Love and Laughter,
Dorlana







